Products are selected by our editors, we may earn commission from links on this page.
A new California law now requires drivers convicted of DUI to install breath-activated technology in their cars, marking a major shift in how the state enforces drunk driving laws. Instead of relying solely on fines, license suspensions, or court-mandated classes, thousands of offenders must now physically modify their vehicles by installing ignition interlock devices that prevent a car from starting if alcohol is detected on the driver’s breath. Supporters argue the mandate will save lives and reduce repeat offenses. Critics, however, warn it blurs the line between public safety and constant monitoring behind the wheel.
What the New Law Actually Requires
The law mandates the installation of an ignition interlock device, or IID, in a driver’s personal vehicle after a DUI conviction. Before the car can start, the driver must blow into the device. If alcohol is detected above a preset threshold, the engine will not turn over. The requirement applies regardless of whether the offense involved injury or repeat violations, removing discretion that judges previously had in some cases.
Why California Is Expanding the Program
State officials point to stubbornly high numbers of alcohol-related crashes. According to California traffic safety data, impaired driving contributes to more than 1,300 deaths each year. Lawmakers argue that traditional penalties haven’t done enough to prevent repeat offenses. IIDs, they say, directly stop impaired driving before it happens rather than punishing it afterward.
From Pilot Program to Permanent Policy
California has experimented with ignition interlock devices for years through a statewide pilot program. Assembly Bill 366 transforms that trial approach into a long-term policy, extending the mandate through at least 2033. Under the new rules, all DUI convictions trigger IID installation as a condition for regaining driving privileges, closing loopholes that previously allowed some offenders to avoid the requirement.
How Ignition Interlock Devices Work in Real Life
Once installed, the device requires a clean breath sample every time the vehicle starts and, in some cases, during random rolling tests while driving. Data from the device can be reviewed by authorities or service providers to ensure compliance. While proponents say this builds accountability, some drivers report the technology can be inconvenient, sensitive to environmental factors, or costly to maintain.
The Cost Burden on Convicted Drivers
IID installation and monthly maintenance fees are paid by the driver, not the state. Costs can add up over time, especially for lower-income Californians who rely on driving for work. While financial assistance programs exist, critics argue the mandate creates unequal consequences depending on a person’s ability to pay—raising questions about fairness in enforcement.
Supporters Say It Saves Lives
Lawmakers backing the law frame it as a public safety breakthrough. Assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norris, who sponsored the legislation, has said the policy ensures that no DUI offender can bypass what she calls a “critical safeguard.” Traffic safety advocates cite studies suggesting ignition interlock devices significantly reduce repeat DUI offenses when installed.
Critics Warn of Overreach and Surveillance
Opponents don’t dispute the dangers of drunk driving but question whether mandatory vehicle modifications go too far. Some civil liberties advocates argue the law normalizes constant monitoring and could set a precedent for broader technological controls on drivers. Others worry about device accuracy, data privacy, and the potential for unintended penalties from false readings.
Enforcement Will Increase in 2026
California’s DMV will require proof of IID installation before restoring a suspended license, and law enforcement agencies are preparing for stricter compliance checks once the law takes effect. Officials say the change reflects a broader shift toward technology-based traffic enforcement, with fewer warnings and less discretion built into the system.
What This Means for California Drivers
California’s expanded IID mandate places the state among the most aggressive in the nation when it comes to preventing drunk driving through technology. For supporters, it represents progress that could save lives. For skeptics, it raises deeper questions about how much control the state should exert over personal vehicles. As the 2026 rollout approaches, the debate over safety, privacy, and fairness is only expected to grow.