FAA Targets Passenger Behavior That Could Get Some Travelers Barred From Flights

A federal regulator has proposed a $165,000 fine against Alaska Airlines for allegedly letting intoxicated passengers onto its planes eleven times in a single year. The penalty, announced in late May 2026, is rare: the FAA has long had the authority to fine airlines over drunk boarding, but almost never uses it. Now it has, and the aviation industry is watching to see whether more carriers are next.

This article was created with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team for accuracy and clarity.

Federal Law Has Always Banned Drunk Boarding. Enforcement Is Another Story.

Under Section 121.575 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, no airline may allow any person who appears intoxicated to board an aircraft. The rule has been on the books for decades. In practice, flight attendants are typically stretched thin during boarding, juggling safety checks, luggage logistics, and passenger needs simultaneously. A traveler skilled at masking impairment can slip through without triggering any alarm.

The FAA Audited Alaska Airlines for a Full Year Before Issuing the Fine

The FAA says Alaska Airlines allowed visibly intoxicated passengers to board on 11 separate flights between February 2024 and February 2025. Rather than moving immediately to a penalty, the agency first engaged the airline directly, kicking off a year-long audit of its passenger screening policies. Alaska Airlines has 30 days after receiving the enforcement letter to respond, and can either pay the fine or challenge it.

Alaska Airlines Says It Has Already Made “Meaningful Changes”

Alaska Airlines cooperated fully with the FAA review and says it took action well before the penalty was announced. According to the airline’s spokesperson Tim Thompson, Alaska has made “meaningful changes” since the FAA first raised concerns, including enhanced training for all flight attendants and customer service agents. The carrier has not publicly stated whether it will pay or contest the $165,000 fine.

An Off-Duty Officer Saw Her at the Terminal. She Boarded Anyway.

One incident from November 2024 illustrates precisely what the FAA wants airlines to catch. An off-duty police officer at Bethel Airport described passenger Caryn Evan, 38, as appearing very intoxicated and aggressive before her flight, observing her bumping into strangers in the terminal. Her husband later told investigators she had consumed more alcohol than usual because of anxiety about flying. She was allowed to board.

Chefornak Bans Alcohol. Bethel Does Not. Evan Drank Before the Flight.

Evan is from Chefornak, a remote Alaska Native village where alcohol is completely prohibited. Traveling through Bethel gave her access to something unavailable at home. She consumed two or three drinks at the airport before boarding Alaska Airlines Flight 46 to Anchorage, then had one or two more drinks during the approximately one-hour flight. The combination of resumed drinking after abstinence and cabin altitude can intensify alcohol’s effects in unpredictable ways.

As the Plane Descended Into Anchorage, Evan Had to Be Restrained With Flex Cuffs

As the aircraft began its descent, Evan was seen flailing her arms, yelling, slamming her head against the seat in front of her, and striking her husband. A nurse on board volunteered to help, and the flight crew eventually restrained Evan with flex cuffs. A breath-alcohol test administered after landing showed her blood-alcohol content was more than three times Alaska’s legal limit for driving. She was arrested on a federal charge of interference with flight crew.

United Airlines Launched a Team-Based “Huddle Process”

United Airlines moved ahead of the regulatory pressure. Starting May 1, 2025, United implemented its “huddle process”: if two flight attendants independently observe a passenger showing signs of intoxication after boarding, they must call a mandatory meeting between cabin crew, flight operations, and airport staff before any removal decision is made. The system uses a traffic-light framework, with red-light behaviors, including slurred speech, impaired coordination, or inability to sit upright, triggering the huddle and potential removal.

The Alaska Fine May Signal an Industry-Wide Crackdown Is Coming

The FAA’s action against Alaska follows a broader pattern of audits designed to drive a safety culture shift across the industry. If enforcement expands to other carriers, the burden falls heaviest on gate agents and flight attendants, the staff positioned to catch intoxication before takeoff. Airlines may also revisit pre-flight alcohol service in first class, a longstanding perk that complicates crew efforts to assess passenger fitness before departure.

The FAA’s Message to Airlines: Drunk Boarding Is a Safety Violation, Not a Judgment Call

The $165,000 fine against Alaska Airlines is modest by corporate standards, but its significance is regulatory: the FAA is signaling that a rule long treated as aspirational is now subject to enforcement. United Airlines has already built a structured response. Alaska has overhauled its training. For passengers, the practical consequence is straightforward. Drink visibly before or during a flight, and the crew watching you may now be required to act.