New York Fashion Week Has a Strange New Footwear Trend, and It Barely Involves Shoes

At the spring/summer 2027 shows in New York, models at Tory Burch, Calvin Klein, Jane Wade, Area and 7 For All Mankind walked without shoes. Not minimal shoes. None. The season had already been leaning toward the exposed foot, with flip-flops and ballet flats circulating across collections, but removing footwear entirely is a different kind of decision. At Tory Burch, a bare foot finished a butter-yellow car coat cut on a 1960s line, paired with a woven evening bag. Burch described the collection in her show notes as being about the joy of getting dressed. The styling suggested that part of the joy was deciding what to leave off.

This article was created with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team for accuracy and clarity.

The naked shoe lasted less than a season

In April, Matthieu Blazy showed his Chanel cruise 2027 collection and introduced what the industry quickly labeled the naked shoe: footwear designed to disappear against the skin. It was treated as the logical endpoint of a long trend toward minimal, barely-there soles and straps. New York’s spring/summer 2027 calendar arrived afterward and went past it inside a few months. The naked shoe reduces the shoe to almost nothing. The barefoot look removes the premise. For an industry that usually takes several seasons to absorb an idea and then push it further, the compression here was unusual, and it happened without anyone selling a product at the end of it.

What a shoe normally does in a runway look

Footwear on a runway carries a specific workload. It sets the proportion of the leg, fixes the era a silhouette refers to, controls how fast a model moves, and tells the audience what kind of occasion the clothes belong to. A block heel and a trainer send a look to two different places. Remove the shoe and all of that goes to the garment, the gait, and the viewer’s imagination. That is why barefoot styling reads as a design decision rather than an oversight. The designer is withdrawing a tool that normally does a quarter of the storytelling and asking the rest of the look to cover it.

Calvin Klein offered the wearable version

The afternoon after Tory Burch, Veronica Leoni showed her Calvin Klein collection with what amounted to a compromise. Her crochet sandals wrapped around the ankle and lower foot in an almost thong-like arrangement, with the sides cut away so the toes stayed visible. She called it an anti-shoe. It is still extreme, but it is a thing a person can buy and put on. The shape matched the rest of the collection, which worked in clean, almost hedonistic lines that pointed back to the label’s 1990s identity. Among the week’s barefoot gestures, Leoni’s was the one that could travel off the runway without a disclaimer.

Area staged a woman leaving the party

At Area, the models took their lace sock heels off during the show. One finished her walk in a confetti-effect micromini dress, carrying a pair of heels in her hand. Designer Nicholas Aburn builds his collections around a specific character and a specific night, and the gesture fit that framework whether or not it was planned as narrative. The image is familiar enough to need no explanation: the end of a long night, the shoes finally off, the walk home shortened by a few degrees of dignity. The clothes stayed glamorous. The feet reported what time it was.

7 For All Mankind sent out exactly one

Nicola Brognano’s 7 For All Mankind collection ran on indie-sleaze references: low-rise check hot pants, skintight cigarette pants, and stacks of long beaded necklaces. Most models wore block heels appropriate to the aughts. One did not, and walked barefoot instead, as though she had abandoned the shoes somewhere in the middle of the evening. The single exception does more than a full barefoot cast would. Nine models in heels establish the rule, and the tenth without them becomes a character rather than a theme. It is the cheapest storytelling device available to a stylist, and it only works once per show.

Jane Wade put grass on the ankles

Jane Wade’s barefoot looks came attached to gorpcore pieces, the technical outdoor style that borrows from hiking and trail gear. A forest green dress was shown with no shoes and blades of grass lining the ankles. The grass is the part that matters. Barefoot alone is an absence, which is hard to read from a seat twenty feet away. Barefoot with grass stuck to the skin is evidence of somewhere the model has been. It converts a missing accessory into a location, which is the problem every barefoot look has to solve before the audience files it as a styling error.

New York sidewalks are the obvious objection

The practical case for barefoot dressing is weak, and it is weakest in New York specifically. City sidewalks collect broken glass, construction grit, road salt in winter, and the ordinary debris of eight million people. Hot asphalt in summer reaches temperatures that will blister skin. Most restaurants and many shops post shirt-and-shoes requirements at the door. None of this applies on a runway, which is a swept, climate-controlled, roughly one-hundred-foot surface a model crosses twice. The gap between those two environments is the entire reason the look registers as fantasy rather than as a suggestion, and the designers appear to understand that.

Shoeless runways have a long, thin history

Barefoot models are not new, but they have usually arrived attached to a stated reason. Collections referencing dance, beachwear, spiritual practice or deliberate anti-fashion have sent models out unshod for decades, and the absence read as costume logic rather than styling. What happened in New York for spring/summer 2027 is narrower and stranger: five unrelated designers, working in silhouettes from 1960s tailoring to technical outdoor gear to aughts club clothes, reaching the same conclusion in the same week. No single reference connects a car coat, a crochet sandal and a confetti micromini. The shared element is only the decision to stop at the ankle.

The foot became the accessory

Strip away the week’s individual choices, and one thing is left. When a designer removes the shoe, the foot stops being the thing a product sits on and becomes the finishing element itself. That is a meaningful inversion for an industry in which footwear is frequently the most profitable category a fashion house sells, and often the entry point for a customer who will never buy the clothes. These shows put nothing in that slot. For anyone considering the look outside a show venue, the short version is that it was built for a swept floor and photographed from eight feet away.