Products are selected by our editors, we may earn commission from links on this page.
Sydney Sweeney has become accustomed to campaigns generating conversation, but her latest partnership triggered a particularly sharp response online. What began as a new sports focused advertisement quickly turned into criticism from athletes and social media users, followed by a noticeable change in her Instagram audience. More than 200,000 followers reportedly disappeared within two days. Yet what happened next showed that Sweeney was not simply going to disappear from the conversation.
The Campaign That Started It All
The controversy began after Sweeney promoted Novig, a sports prediction market, in its “Just Sports” campaign. The advertisement featured her posing with various pieces of sports equipment while wearing little to no clothing, an approach intended to deliver the campaign’s message with humor and provocation. Sweeney was also more than the face of the advertisement: she joined Novig as a strategic partner and equity holder, giving her a deeper connection to the company.
Female Athletes Had a Very Different Reaction
The campaign soon drew criticism over the way women and sports were being represented. Four time Olympic swimming gold medalist Ariarne Titmus publicly criticized the imagery, while British sprinter Amy Hunt used a post race interview to emphasize the work, strength, and dedication behind women’s athletics. Other female athletes joined the criticism as the campaign circulated. Their responses transformed what might have remained a provocative celebrity advertisement into a much broader discussion about women in sports.
Then Her Instagram Numbers Took a Sudden Turn
Interestingly, Sweeney’s follower count did not fall immediately. Published reports citing Social Blade said she gained roughly 50,000 followers during the first three days after the campaign appeared. The direction then reversed dramatically, with a reported loss of 136,848 followers on one day and roughly another 68,000 the following day. Together, those figures pushed the two day decline beyond 200,000 as criticism of the campaign continued spreading.
The Headline Number Was Only Part of the Picture
A loss of more than 200,000 followers is striking, but the scale of Sweeney’s existing audience adds important context. At the time, she had more than 25 million Instagram followers, meaning the two day decline represented less than one percent of her total following. The available data also cannot establish why individual users unfollowed her or prove that every departure resulted from the advertisement. Still, the sudden reversal gave the controversy another reason to attract attention.
Sweeney’s Next Move Was Not an Apology
As criticism continued, Sweeney did not retreat from the campaign or issue a lengthy explanation. Instead, she posted additional material from the Novig shoot and appeared to answer the broader debate through her Instagram Stories. She shared examples of well known athletes who had previously posed nude or semi nude for ESPN’s Body Issue. The posts shifted attention toward an uncomfortable question at the center of the controversy: when does provocative sports imagery get interpreted differently?
She Pointed to Some Very Familiar Sports Names
Among the athletes Sweeney highlighted were Serena Williams, Ronda Rousey, Sue Bird, Megan Rapinoe, and Caroline Wozniacki, along with male athletes who had participated in similar shoots. Sweeney did not need a lengthy caption to make the comparison visible. Her posts appeared to invite viewers to consider those earlier images alongside her own campaign. Whether audiences found that comparison persuasive was another matter, and the criticism surrounding the Novig advertisement did not simply disappear.
Her Response Added Another Layer to the Debate
The comparison raised an important distinction that helped keep the conversation going. ESPN’s Body Issue featured athletes presenting their own bodies within a project centered on athleticism, while Sweeney is an actress appearing in an advertisement for a sports prediction platform. Critics therefore argued that the contexts were not interchangeable, while defenders questioned why provocative imagery should automatically be considered disrespectful. Instead of settling the backlash, Sweeney’s response gave people another aspect of the campaign to debate.
Then the Follower Story Changed Again
The sharp decline initially suggested that Sweeney’s audience might continue shrinking, but the numbers soon complicated that narrative. In the days following the loss, she reportedly regained more than 116,000 Instagram followers. That rebound did not erase the backlash, nor does it reveal what individual followers thought about the advertisement. It does, however, show why social media controversies can be difficult to judge from one dramatic number captured at a single moment.
The 200,000 Followers Were Not the End of the Story
Sweeney’s Novig controversy ultimately became about more than a sudden drop in followers. The campaign drew criticism from prominent athletes, her Instagram audience shifted sharply, and her decision to highlight similar imagery from sports history kept the discussion moving rather than closing it down. Her subsequent follower rebound made the picture even less straightforward. In an online controversy, the first dramatic statistic may grab attention, but what happens afterward can tell a very different story.