Products are selected by our editors, we may earn commission from links on this page.
The Washington Post is undergoing one of the most dramatic shake-ups in its modern history. In early February, the paper laid off roughly a third of its workforce in a single day, cutting hundreds of jobs across the newsroom and business operations. One employee, speaking anonymously to The Guardian, described it bluntly: “It’s an absolute bloodbath.”
The scale of the layoffs prompted former executive editor Marty Baron to say the move “ranks among the darkest days in the history of one of the world’s greatest news organizations.” In his view, the cuts will sharply diminish the Post’s ambitions and leave its staff “further depleted” at a moment when fact-based reporting is badly needed.
For staff, the news ended weeks of anxiety about rumored cuts that leadership had declined to confirm or deny. Many found themselves suddenly locked out of internal systems and the building, a break from how previous rounds of buyouts had been handled, and a jarring signal that this reset would be more abrupt and more painful than anything in recent memory.
What Is Changing Inside the Post
In a company-wide meeting, executive editor Matt Murray described the layoffs as part of a “strategic reset” meant to “secure our future” and bring “stability” to a newsroom he said must adapt to a crowded media marketplace. According to a reporting by the BBC, the cuts hit sports, local, and foreign coverage particularly hard and will reshape what readers see every day.
The Post is eliminating its traditional sports desk, with some staffers reassigned to a smaller, restructured team. Its Metro section, which covers Washington, D.C. and the surrounding region, has also been sharply reduced, prompting one local reporter to ask at a rally, “How is the Metro desk supposed to earn the community’s trust if you keep taking resources away from the Metro section of this paper?”
International coverage is being scaled back to about a dozen foreign bureaus, with a stated focus on national security. The paper is also cutting its standalone books desk and suspending its flagship daily news podcast, Post Reports. Laid-off employees will remain on the payroll through April with continued health insurance, but many say the abrupt end to their work and projects left unfinished has been especially hard to absorb.
Why Leadership Says Cuts Were Needed and Why Critics Are Alarmed
In a memo to staff, Murray wrote that “today’s news is painful” but argued that, to thrive rather than merely endure, the Post must “reinvent our journalism and our business model with renewed ambition.” He pointed to a sharp drop in web traffic over the last three years and said the outlet had become “too rooted in a different era,” even as artificial intelligence and new competitors reshaped how audiences get news.
The BBC reports that the Post has also been grappling with subscriber losses and backlash to recent editorial decisions, including owner Jeff Bezos’s move not to endorse a presidential candidate in 2024 and to narrow the opinion section around “personal liberties and free markets.” Those choices broke with decades of tradition and coincided with tens of thousands of subscribers leaving, even as rivals like The New York Times continued to add digital readers.
Unions representing newsroom and tech workers strongly dispute the idea that cutting journalists is the path to stability. In a joint statement, the Washington Post Guild said, “A newsroom cannot be hollowed out without consequences for its credibility, its reach and its future,” arguing that continued layoffs will weaken the paper, drive away readers, and undercut its mission “to hold power to account without fear or favor.” Some union leaders have gone further, suggesting that if Bezos is no longer willing to invest, the paper may need a different steward.
What This Means for Journalism, Readers, and the Post’s Future
The day after the cuts, laid-off staff and supporters rallied outside the Post’s Washington headquarters, organized by the Post News Guild and Post Tech Guild. Former transportation reporter Rachel Weiner, who spent 15 years at the paper, told WTOP she was mourning both her job and the loss to the community, saying it was “really disappointing having worked to cover as much as possible in this region because it’s also important. The Post has just decided it doesn’t matter to them.”
Speakers warned that the damage would extend far beyond the newsroom. Former sports reporter Molly Hensley-Clancy called the elimination of the sports desk “heartbreaking” and “senseless,” adding, “There simply is no Washington Post without sports.” Former enterprise reporter Marissa Lang told the crowd she didn’t think “we know yet the impact of losing 300 journalists who hold power to account,” but believed the region, country, and world were “a worse place today” for having lost them.
What happens next will determine whether this reset stabilizes the Post or accelerates its decline. Leadership insists the cuts will sharpen coverage around politics, national news, and a handful of key topics like science, health, technology, climate, and business. Critics counter that a paper can’t cut its way to relevance, especially when trust in media is already fragile. For readers watching from the outside, the moment feels like a test of whether one of America’s most storied newsrooms can reinvent itself without hollowing out the very journalism that made it matter in the first place.