Products are selected by our editors, we may earn commission from links on this page.
Real estate executive Gloria Caulfield had barely finished the sentence when the crowd turned on her. “The rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution,” she told graduates at the University of Central Florida on May 8, 2026. The auditorium erupted in boos. “OK, I struck a chord. May I finish?” she asked. Then someone in the crowd yelled, “AI sucks!”
It Was Not Just One School, Or One Speaker
The UCF scene was no outlier. Across Arizona, Florida, Tennessee, and beyond, graduation speakers who praised artificial intelligence were met with jeers from the very students they were meant to inspire. Big Machine Records CEO Scott Borchetta, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, and an invited AI expert at Marquette University all faced booing crowds. The pattern was consistent enough to earn its own national coverage: mention AI, expect resistance.
At One School, AI Did Not Just Offend
Glendale Community College in Arizona gave graduates a more tangible reason to boo. The school used an AI system to read student names aloud during its May 15 commencement, and it botched or skipped hundreds of them entirely. School president Tiffany Hernandez acknowledged the problem onstage: “We’re using a new AI system as our reader. That is a lesson learned for us.” Many students had to walk the stage a second time, names read by a human. Graduate Grace Reimer said it ruined “one of the biggest moments in my life.”
Eric Schmidt Got the Loudest Rejection Of All
No speaker absorbed more anger than former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. At the University of Arizona on May 16, his speech comparing AI to past technological revolutions drew boos that lasted, nearly without interruption, for minutes. Graduate Bailey Ekstrom, 21, told The Independent she had never seen campus opinion so unified. One student in the crowd stood up and announced to no one in particular, “Oh, f*** this guy.”
Speakers Pushed Back, and It Made Things Worse
Rather than acknowledge the crowd’s frustration, several speakers doubled down. Borchetta, at Middle Tennessee State University, told students booing his remarks on AI’s role in music production: “I know it. Deal with it. Like I said, it’s a tool.” Schmidt tried several times to regain control of the Arizona audience, pivoting to immigration and diversity, but the boos continued. Their defiance deepened the divide between those on stage — executives who had benefited from tech — and the graduates about to enter a job market reshaped by it. But the week was not all boos.
One Quip Landed
At Grand Valley State University in Michigan, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak drew laughter and applause with a single line: “You all have AI. Actual intelligence.” The contrast was striking. Speakers who positioned AI as something to embrace and adapt to were jeered. The one who turned the acronym into a compliment for the graduates themselves got cheered. The difference was not really about AI at all — it was about who the speaker seemed to be talking to, and whether they understood the room.
The Numbers Explain the Noise
A March 2026 Quinnipiac University poll found that 81% of Gen Z respondents — the generation filling most graduation seats — believe AI will reduce the number of jobs available. That figure is higher than any other age group. The same poll found that 55% of all Americans now consider AI more harmful than helpful, up sharply from 44% just a year earlier. Entry-level job postings in the U.S. have dropped 35% since 2023, making the fear concrete and personal.
Academics Say the Anger Runs Deeper Than Jobs
Fabrizio Cariani, a philosophy professor and department chair at the University of Maryland who teaches a class on AI and the Human Experience, says graduate concerns cluster around several areas: job displacement, the environmental cost of large AI data centers, questions of academic integrity, and the harder-to-define anxiety about what authenticity means when machines can generate writing, art, and thought. In his own classroom, when he designed assignments that required AI collaboration, the majority of students responded with what he described as “an attitude of rejection.”
The AI Stigma On-Going
Cariani notes that not all students opposing AI speak openly. On his campus, there is a stigma around using AI for academic work — students can face punishment or expulsion for violations — which pushes some supporters underground. The visible anger at graduation ceremonies, he argues, reflects a genuine and reasoned set of concerns, and he welcomes it: “I think it’s a good development to put these questions at the front of the conversation. Booing is an immediate reaction. I want to see those thoughts enter the conversation,” he told USA TODAY.
A Generation Sending a Message Worth Reading
The Class of 2026 did not boo because they misunderstand AI. They booed because they understand it well enough to be worried. They are entering a labor market already restructured by the technology, burdened by academic rules restricting its use, and surveyed overwhelmingly pessimistic about what it means for their futures. The commencement hall, typically a space for celebration, became something else this spring: the place where a generation publicly recorded its objection to a future being built without asking them first.